Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

US v. Steward, No. 08-2666

By FindLaw Staff on March 17, 2010 12:48 PM

US v. Steward, No. 08-2666, involved the government's appeal of defendant's drug conspiracy sentence.  The Eighth Circuit affirmed the sentence, on the ground that defendant's prior Iowa conviction for operating a vehicle without the owner's consent did not qualify as a "crime of violence" under U.S.S.G. section 4B1.2(a).

As the court wrote:  "Williams and Mureta-Espinosa are likewise controlling in the present case. Although Williams involved § 2K2.1 and Mureta-Espinosa involved section 2L1.2, not section 4B1.2(a), we explained in Williams that "[t]he commentary to both section 2K2.1 and section 4B1.1 refer to section 4B1.2(a), which provides a definition of a 'crime of violence' that is virtually identical to the definition of a 'violent felony' in the Armed Career Criminal Act." 537 F.3d at 971. Furthermore, we stated that "[i]n construing whether auto theft and auto tampering are crimes of violence, we look at what is commonly referred to as the 'otherwise' clause of 18 U.S.C. section 924(e)(2)(B)(ii) or U.S.S.G. section 4B1.2(a)(2)." Id. at 972. Therefore, we hold that the Iowa offense of OVWOC is not a "crime of violence" for purposes of section 4B1.2(a)."

Related Resources

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard

Find a Lawyer

More Options