Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Search for legal issues
For help near (city, ZIP code or county)
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location

US v. Sarras, No. 08-11757

Article Placeholder Image
By FindLaw Staff on July 23, 2009 3:55 PM

Defendant's child pornography conviction and sentence are affirmed, where 1) defendant did not show that his expert witness's methodology was a sufficiently reliable identification technique; and 2) defendant's proffered testimony that child pornography cases usually involve multiple children would have been cumulative.

Read US v. Sarras, No. 08-11757

Appellate Information

Filed July 23, 2009

Judges

Opinion by Judge Quist

Find a Lawyer

More Options