Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Search for legal issues
For help near (city, ZIP code or county)
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location

Harris v. United Auto. Ins. Grp., Inc., No. 08-16097

Article Placeholder Image
By FindLaw Staff on August 20, 2009 4:22 PM

In an action seeking to reinstate plaintiff's health insurance benefits, dismissal of the complaint is affirmed where 26 C.F.R. section 54.4980B-8, A-5 did not apply to the employer-provided insurance plan in which plaintiff was participating, and thus his late payment of his insurance premium could not be excused under that regulation.

Read Harris v. United Auto. Ins. Grp., Inc., No. 08-16097

Appellate Information

Filed August 18, 2009

Judges

Per Curiam

Find a Lawyer

More Options