Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Search for legal issues
For help near (city, ZIP code or county)
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location

Am. Contractors Indem. Co. v. US, No. 08-5188

Article Placeholder Image
By FindLaw Staff on June 29, 2009 3:18 PM

In a breach of contract action brought pursuant to the Tucker Act, Court of Federal Claims judgment is reversed and remanded where the court erred in dismissing plaintiff's complaint for failure to state a claim, as the effective date of a surety bond is not necessarily the date of agreement or acquiescence within the meaning of 13 C.F.R. sec. 115.19(e). 

Read Am. Contractors Indem. Co. v. US, No. 08-5188

Appellate Information
Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims.
Decided June 29, 2009

Judges
Before NEWMAN, SCHALL, and DYK, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by DYK, Circuit Judge.

Counsel
For Plaintiff: Jefferson B. Slagle, Thompson, Slagle & Hannan, LLC, Duluth, Georgia.
For Defendant: Sean M. Dunn, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC.

Find a Lawyer

More Options