Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Lisanti v. Office of Personnel Mgmt., No. 08-3261

By FindLaw Staff on July 29, 2009 4:03 PM

Merit Systems Protection Board judgment regarding the Office of Personnel Management's calculation of plaintiff's retirement annuity is affirmed where: 1) the Board erred in stating that neither it nor OPM had the authority to question the Administrative Office's determination of plaintiff's basic pay; 2) the Board properly affirmed the OPM's decision that transcript income should not be included in the definition of basic pay; and 3) plaintiff's request for class treatment is moot since Board's decision that plaintiff's transcript income did not qualify as basic pay has been affirmed.    

Read Lisanti v. Office of Personnel Mgmt., No. 08-3261

Appellate Information
Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board.
Decided July 29, 2009

Judges
Before MICHEL, Chief Judge, and NEWMAN and LOURIE, Circuit Judges
Opinion by LOURIE, Circuit Judge.

Counsel
For Petitioner: Linda D. Friedman, Stowell & Friedman, Ltd.

For Respondent: Tara J. Kilfoyle, United States Department of Justice.

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard

Find a Lawyer

More Options