Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Search for legal issues
For help near (city, ZIP code or county)
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location

Wedgetail, Ltd. v. Huddleston Deluxe, Inc., No. 09-1045

Article Placeholder Image
By FindLaw Staff on August 12, 2009 4:16 PM

In a dispute over attorney's fees in a patent infringement action, the district court's decision not to award attorney's fees is affirmed where: 1) nothing in the record compels a finding of exceptionality or otherwise suggests a need for the district court to provide its reasoning, and thus the lack of detailed analysis by the court does not warrant reversal; and 2) the court did not err in failing to entertain a motion for attorney's fees, and any error that did occur was harmless.    

Read Wedgetail, Ltd. v. Huddleston Deluxe, Inc., No. 09-1045

Appellate Information
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas.
Decided August 12, 2009

Judges
Before SCHALL, GAJARSA, and DYK, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by GAJARSA, Circuit Judge.

Counsel
For Plaintiff: Andy Tindel, Provost Umphrey Law Firm, LLP, Tyler, Texas.

For Defendant: Marc M. Gorelnik, Townsend and Townsend and Crew LLP, San Francisco, California.  

Find a Lawyer

More Options