Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Martek BioSci. Corp. v. Nutrinova, Inc., No. 08-1459

By FindLaw Staff on September 03, 2009 5:48 PM

In a patent infringement action involving patents relating to specified microorganisms that are useful for the commercial production of an essential omega-3 fatty acid, district court's judgment is affirmed in part and reversed in part where: 1) district court did not err in denying defendant's motion for judgment as a matter of law (JMOL) as substantial evidence support the jury's finding that the certain patent claims were entitled to the priority date of a 1988 application; 2) district court did not err in denying defendant's JMOL motion as plaintiff presented substantial evidence of expert testimony based on the accused process supporting the jury's infringement verdict; 3) district court did not abuse its discretion when it determined that defendant could not corroborate an expert's testimony and thus excluded defendant's evidence of prior inventorship; 4) district court did not commit legal error in construing the term "non-chloride sodium salt"; 5) district court erred in granting the motion for JMOL as to certain patent claims as evidence supports the jury's implicit finding that one need not perform undue experimentation to practice these claims, as well as the jury's ultimate conclusion that defendant failed to prove invalidity of those claims by clear and convincing evidence; and 6) district court's claim construction for the term "animal" is erroneous as the proper construction is the one explicitly provided by the patentee.   

Read Martek BioSci. Corp. v. Nutrinova, Inc., No. 08-1459

Appellate Information

Appeal from:  United States District Court for the District of Delaware

Decided September 3, 2009

Judges

Before Newman, Lourie, Rader, Gajarsa,  Moore, CIrcuit Judges. 
Opinion by Gajarsa, Circuit Judge.   

Counsel

For Appellant: Gregory A. Castania, Jones Day, Gidon D. Stern, and Samuel B. Abrams, Dechert LLP

For Appellees: George Pazuniak, Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice PLLC, Oleh V. Bilynsky and Stephen J. Mackenzie

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard

Find a Lawyer

More Options