Navajo Nation v. U.S., 10-5036, concerned a challenge to the district court's dismissal of the complaint in concluding that plaintiff
did not have the requisite property interest to establish a valid
takings action, in an Indian Tribe's suit seeking damages for an alleged Fifth Amendment taking of its right to develop land granted to it by the United States in 1934.
In vacating the judgment and remanding with instructions to dismiss for
lack of jurisdiction, the court held that, even assuming arguendo that
the 1934 Act vested the Navajo Nation with the right to unilateral
development within the Bennett Freeze area, and the restrictions on
development within that area could be construed as a compensable taking
of the Nation's property rights, any Fifth Amendment takings claim is
barred because it was filed more than six years after it first accrued.