Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Search for legal issues
For help near (city, ZIP code or county)
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location

US v. Jang, No. 08-10616

Article Placeholder Image
By FindLaw Staff on June 30, 2009 5:59 PM

The revocation of Defendant's supervised release, based on his violation of a condition of his release by providing misleading answers to questions posed by a Korean consulate, is affirmed where the District Court could reasonably have concluded that Defendant made the statements with the intent to hinder his departure.

Read US v. Jang, No. 08-10616

Appellate Information

Filed June 30, 2009


Opinion by Judge Haynes

Find a Lawyer

More Options