Civil Rights
Block on Trump's Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
In an action seeking to foreclose on plaintiff's security interests in loan collateral, district court's order allowing the foreclosure is affirmed where: 1) collateral estoppel precluded defendants from raising the statute of limitations; 2) plaintiff would be prejudiced by a subrogation that would allow one defendant to compete on an equal or superior footing for the secured interest in the irrigation equipment at issue; and 3) plaintiff was entitled to attorney's fees under the debt contracts between the parties.
Read Rabo Agrifinance Inc. v. Terra XXI Ltd., No. 08-10143
Appellate Information
Filed September 22, 2009
Judges
Opinion by Judge Jones