Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Chaney v. Dreyfus Serv. Corp., No. 08-60555

By FindLaw Staff on January 25, 2010 5:06 PM

In a tort and civil RICO action against an investment company through which a third party funneled certain insurance companies' funds before moving them to his Swiss bank account, summary judgment for defendant is affirmed in part where there was no evidence that defendant knew or ought to have known that the funds it processed on behalf of the third party's firm were, in fact, fiduciary. However, the order is vacated in part where New York law did impose on defendant a duty -- in this case running only to certain subaccounts -- to ensure that the transactions it processed on behalf of its customers were authorized.

Read Chaney v. Dreyfus Serv. Corp., No. 08-60555

Appellate Information

Filed January 25, 2010

Judges

Opinion by Judge Jolly

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard

Find a Lawyer

More Options