Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

US v. Hampton, No. 10-10035

By FindLaw Staff on January 10, 2011 3:45 PM

Stolen Mail Sentence Affirmed

In US v. Hampton, No. 10-10035, a prosecution for conspiracy to possess stolen mail, the court affirmed defendant's sentence following the revocation of her supervised release, holding that 18 U.S.C. section 3583(e)(3) did not require aggregation of imprisonment imposed upon revocation of supervised release.

 

As the court wrote:  "Defendant-Appellant Stephanie Hampton was sentenced to 24 months' imprisonment when her supervised release was revoked.   On appeal, Hampton argues that her revocation sentence was illegal because, when aggregated with her prior revocation sentence, the amount of imprisonment exceeded the maximum amount of supervised release authorized for her original offense, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3).   We hold that § 3583(e)(3) does not require aggregation of imprisonment imposed upon revocation of supervised release and AFFIRM the district court's revocation sentence."

Related Resources

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard

Find a Lawyer

More Options