Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Search for legal issues
For help near (city, ZIP code or county)
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location

DeBurgo v. Amand, No. 09-1145

Article Placeholder Image
By FindLaw Staff on November 19, 2009 2:54 PM

District court's denial of defendant's request for habeas relief arising from his conviction for armed assault with intent to murder and assault and batter by means of a dangerous weapon is affirmed where: 1) appeals court's analysis of the sufficiency of the evidence was not an unreasonable application of the Supreme Court's standard announced in Jackson given the sufficiently suggestive circumstantial evidence presented; and 2) defendant was not deprived of his Sixth Amendment right to an impartial jury.  

Read DeBurgo v. Amand, No. 09-1145

Appellate Information

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts

Decided November 19, 2009

Judges

Before: Lipez, Howard, and Stahl, Circuit Judges

Opinion by Stahl, Circuit Judge

Counsel

For Appellant:    Elizabeth Doherty

For Appellee:   Argie K. Shapiro, Assistant Attorney General, Martha Coakley, Attorney General

Find a Lawyer

More Options