Civil Rights
Block on Trump's Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
In plaintiff's employment discrimination, retaliatory harrasment, and hostile work environment action against his former employer, district court's entry of summary judgment for the defendant is affirmed where: 1) district court did not err in holding that the continuing violation doctrine is not available to plaintiff to overcome his time-barred claims; 2) district court did not err in its concluding that there was no evidence of pretext in plaintiff's disciplining, suspension, or termination; and 3) district court acted within its discretion in denying plaintiff's motion to amend and motion for reconsideration as his hostile work environment claim was time-barred.
Read Windross v. Barton Protective Serv., Inc., No. 08-2254
Appellate Information
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Decided November 17, 2009
Judges
Before: Boudin, Gibson, and Howard, Circuit Judges
Opinion by Gibson, Circuit Judge
Counsel
For Appellant: Brailey E. Newton
For Appellee: David C. Hamilton