Block on Trump's Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
In plaintiffs' action against defendants alleging they manufactured and sold defective decking and railing products, judgment of the district court denying plaintiffs' post-judgment motion is affirmed as plaintiffs have not met the burden of showing that they are entitled to relief from the previously entered judgment as a passing request to a possible future motion to amend, contained in an opposition to a motion to dismiss, is without effect in these circumstances.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Decided December 22, 2009
Before: Boudin and Seyla, Circuit Judges, Laplante, District Judge
Opinion by Seyla, Circuit Judge
For Appellant: Kevin P. Roddy, Lynne M. Kizis, Daniel R. Lapinski, Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, P.A., Scott R. Shepherd, Natalie Finkelman Bennett, Nathan C. Zipperian, James E. Miller, Laurie Rubinow, Shepherd, Finkelman, Miller & Shah, LLP, Robert T. Naumes, and Thornton & Naumes LLP