Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Search for legal issues
For help near (city, ZIP code or county)
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location

Saysana v. Gillen, No. 09-1179

Article Placeholder Image
By FindLaw Staff on December 22, 2009 3:15 PM

Grant of a Laotian immigrant-petitioner's request for habeas relief after being taken into custody by the ICE without bond and conclusion that BIA had misinterpreted 8 U.S.C. section 1226 are affirmed as the government has adopted an interpretation contrary to the plain meaning of the statute and in the alternative, even if the statute were ambiguous, the position of the government is not a reasonable one.     

Read Saysana v. Gillen, No. 09-1179

Appellate Information

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts

Decided December 22, 2009

Judges

Before:  Howard, Ripple, and Seyla, Circuit Judges

Opinion by Ripple, Circuit Judge

Counsel

For Appellant:    Theodore W. Atkinson, Trial Attorney, Office of Immigration

For Appellee:     Kerry E. Doyle, Graves & Doyle, Jeanette Kain, and Kaplan, O'Sullivan & Friedman

Find a Lawyer

More Options