Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Search for legal issues
For help near (city, ZIP code or county)
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location

Muhammad v. Kelly, No. 08-13

Article Placeholder Image
By FindLaw Staff on August 07, 2009 5:40 PM

In a capital habeas matter, the denial of the habeas petition is affirmed where: 1) a previously undisclosed ballistics report did not exculpate petitioner, given its inconclusive language; 2) petitioner's counsel did not perform ineffectively by failing to prevent him from representing himself, as he represented himself for only two days during the government's presentation of its case, and his defense attorneys were heavily involved as standby counsel; and 3) petitioner waived his right to present expert mitigation evidence.

Read Muhammad v. Kelly, No. 08-13

Appellate Information

Argued: May 12, 2009

Decided: August 7, 2009


Opinion by Judge Gregory


For Appellant:

Jonathan P. Sheldon, Devine, Connell & Sheldon, PLC, Fairfax, VA

For Appellee:

Katherine Baldwin Burnett, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, VA

Find a Lawyer

More Options