Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Sharpe v. Bell, No. 09-6206

By FindLaw Staff on January 29, 2010 2:38 PM

In habeas proceedings, district court's ruling in favor of defendant on the merits of his ineffective assistance of counsel claims is reversed and remanded as, in reaching its conclusions, the district court ignored the several state post-conviction proceedings which had determined that the evidence defendant presented was not credible and that his constitutional claim was without merit, and such a de novo do-over was impermissible under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996. 

Read Sharpe v. Bell, No. 09-6206

Appellate Information

Argued: December 4, 2009

Decided: January 29, 2010

Judges

Opinion by Chief Judge  Wilkinson

Counsel

For Appellant:   Clarence Joe DelForge, III.

For Appellee:    William Gregory Duke

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard

Find a Lawyer

More Options