Greedy Associates - The FindLaw Legal Lifestyle and Career Blog

Recently in Legal History Category

A program for the state appellate court in Indiana, called Appeals on Wheels, might not be the courthouse inside a food-truck that your modern mind envisions, but it's still awesome!

The focus of the program is to help educate the public about how the justice system works by holding real oral arguments, in real cases, off-site. Unfortunately, unlike The People's Court, or Judge Judy, the public likely feels a bit let down when they learn a decision won't be forthcoming at the end of the episode.

There's no doubt that family court is not easy on the mind, body, nor soul. Sure, there are some lawyers, judges, and court employees who are spiritually recharged by the very fact that they are there, helping families in a really meaningful way. Those folks are special and deserve to be paid more.

But there are also many who have been worn down over the years due to the vicious emotional rollercoaster that is family court, or those who could never handle it to begin with. Surprisingly, sometimes even judges in family court can fall into that category of people who have no business being there. And sadly, as the ABA reported, and many families experienced, you don't have to look any further than a Philly courtroom to find a bad example.

While there may be a stigma associated with telling on others, the federal judiciary has decided that enough is enough within their own ranks.

The new workplace changes recommended by the Federal Judiciary Workplace Conduct Working Group include a requirement for judges to report other judges who cross the line. This is the group that formed in the aftermath of Chief Justice John Roberts' report on misconduct in the judiciary demanding changes. And there's no shortage of stories about judges behaving badly, both in and out of court.

New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman has announced that he will be resigning from his position after rather damning allegations from four women of domestic abuse have become public. Though he denied it all, he resigned the morning after the allegations went public.

The lurid details are disturbing, some dating back a few years, and they're are all the more shocking given Schneiderman's public stance of being a supporter of the #MeToo campaign. Curiously, he led the civil rights charges against the now infamous Harvey Weinstein. In short, the women, whom Schneiderman dated (briefly), detail relationships where he would physically assault them without consent during sexual encounters. As of yet there is no word on whether there will be civil or criminal actions as a result of these allegations, though an official investigation has begun.

In a longshot lawsuit, animal rights activists have filed a lawsuit in the name of a horse named Justice that lives in Oregon. While Justice isn't the proverbial horse with no name that was let free after being rode through the desert for nine days, this horse seems to have a meritorious claim against its former owner.

You see, Justice was severely neglected, left to fend for himself, out the rain and elements. When rescuers found him, he was emaciated, 300 pounds underweight, riddled with lice, rain rot (skin disease), and frostbite. Now, Justice's champions are suing his former owner in order to recover the costs of future medical care and for the horse's pain and suffering.

A recent $50 million jury verdict in a historic hog nuisance case is likely to be significantly reduced due to state law caps on punitive damages. The group of North Carolina plaintiffs were each awarded $75k in compensatory damages, as well as $5 million each in punitive damages, against a pig farming conglomerate.

The case is relatively simple. Residents surrounding the Murphy-Brown/Smithfield pig farm have been forced to deal with the awful smell of pig feces since the farm started operating. What's worse is that experts found that bacteria from the pig feces travelled through the air and was found on the residents' homes. In short, the jury agreed that the residents have suffered damages because the pig farm reduced their property values, and caused significant life disruption.

Alexander Hamilton Is Getting a Law Degree

Alexander Hamilton, a prominent American lawyer, Founding Father and face of the $10 bill, did not have a law degree.

So Albany Law School decided it was about time to give him one. More than two centuries after Hamilton studied and practiced law in New York, the law school will confer an honorary law degree on him.

Of course, the school will not exactly give it to the late nation-builder. A descendant will accept it on his behalf.

The Kansas Secretary of State, Kris Kobach, has made one of those blunders that the internet world labels #FAIL and every attorney dreads: A draft pleading, complete with caps-lock notes and empty bullet points, actually got filed with the court.

Though a corrected version of his post-trial pleading was filed, the level of embarrassment that comes from such an epic blunder is not solely relegated to the legal community. In addition to the grief Kobach is getting from Twitter lawyers over his likely failure to proofread, during the actual trial, he was repeatedly lectured by the court on proper trial procedure.

In an act of protest against fossil fuels, civil rights champion and attorney David Buckley committed suicide via self-immolation.

The attorney was a mere 60 years old and had devoted the early part of his second act to environmental causes. His actions, according to a note found by his body, and emails he sent before carrying out his plan, attempted to raise awareness of mankind's destruction of the environment via burning fossil fuels.

Former Montgomery County District Attorney Bruce Castor had his lawsuit against one of Bill Cosby's accusers, Andrea Constand, and her attorneys, dismissed with prejudice by the court.

In case this piece of the Cosby fallout had gotten past you, Former DA Castor was sued by Constand in 2015, while he was running for election as district attorney. That case is still pending in the federal court. However, he alleged in a separate lawsuit that Constand's lawsuit was an abuse of process, and filed in order to destroy his campaign which was ultimately unsuccessful. Constand's lawsuit related to Castor's actions while serving as district attorney in 2005, where he publicly explained the reasons why he would not file charges against Cosby based on Constand's accusations of sexual assault.