Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Search for legal issues
For help near (city, ZIP code or county)
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location

Sea Hawk Seafoods, Inc. v. Locke, No. 07-35754

Article Placeholder Image
By FindLaw Staff on June 17, 2009 12:44 PM

In an action challenging certain fishery management regulations, the dismissal of the complaint is affirmed where: 1) the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act's (MSA) limitations period barred Plaintiffs' direct challenge to the regulations; and 2) Plaintiffs' failure to act claim was an impermissible attempt to recast its direct challenge to the regulations so as to avoid the MSA's shortened limitations period.

Read the full decision in Sea Hawk Seafoods, Inc. v. Locke, , No. 07-35754.

Appellate Information:

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington John C. Coughenour, District Judge, Presiding.
Argued and Submitted December 9, 2008 -- Seattle, Washington
Filed June 17, 2009


Before: Ronald M. Gould, Richard C. Tallman and Consuelo M. Callahan, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Callahan


Leonard J. Feldman, Michael T. Shein, Kevin P. Sullivan, Seattle, Washington, on behalf of appellants Sea Hawk Seafoods, Inc. and the Non-AFA Processors Association.

Anna T. Katselas, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., on behalf of appellees Gary F. Locke, United States Secretary of Commerce; United States Department of Commerce; National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; and National Marine Fisheries Service.

Find a Lawyer

More Options