Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Sea Hawk Seafoods, Inc. v. Locke, No. 07-35754

By FindLaw Staff on June 17, 2009 12:44 PM

In an action challenging certain fishery management regulations, the dismissal of the complaint is affirmed where: 1) the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act's (MSA) limitations period barred Plaintiffs' direct challenge to the regulations; and 2) Plaintiffs' failure to act claim was an impermissible attempt to recast its direct challenge to the regulations so as to avoid the MSA's shortened limitations period.

Read the full decision in Sea Hawk Seafoods, Inc. v. Locke, , No. 07-35754.

Appellate Information:

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington John C. Coughenour, District Judge, Presiding.
Argued and Submitted December 9, 2008 -- Seattle, Washington
Filed June 17, 2009

Judges:

Before: Ronald M. Gould, Richard C. Tallman and Consuelo M. Callahan, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Callahan

Counsel:

Leonard J. Feldman, Michael T. Shein, Kevin P. Sullivan, Seattle, Washington, on behalf of appellants Sea Hawk Seafoods, Inc. and the Non-AFA Processors Association.

Anna T. Katselas, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., on behalf of appellees Gary F. Locke, United States Secretary of Commerce; United States Department of Commerce; National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; and National Marine Fisheries Service.

Copied to clipboard

Find a Lawyer

More Options