Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Tennison v. San Francisco, No. 06-15426

By FindLaw Staff on June 23, 2009 4:42 PM

In a 42 U.S.C. section 1983 action based on Defendant-Officers' alleged withholding of exculpatory evidence, the partial denial of Defendants' motion for summary judgment based on qualified immunity is affirmed, where police inspectors have a duty to disclose exculpatory evidence and a showing of bad faith was not required.

Read Tennison v. City and County of San Francisco, No. 06-15426

Appellate Information

Argued and Submitted June 12, 2007

Submission Vacated May 21, 2008

Resubmitted September 22, 2008

Filed December 8, 2008

Amended June 23, 2009

Judges

Opinion by Circuit Judge Tashima

Counsel

For Appellees:

Elliot R. Peters, Keker & Van Nest, LLP, San Francisco, CA

John H. Scott, The Scott Law Firm, San Francisco, CA

For Appellants:

James A. Quadra, Moscone, Emblidge & Quadra, LLP, San Francisco, CA

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard

Find a Lawyer

More Options