Block on Trump's Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Defendant's conviction and sentence for illegal reentry into the U.S. are affirmed where: 1) the indictment was legally sufficient to support Defendant's enhanced sentence; and 2) the District Court properly denied Defendant's motion to suppress his post-arrest confession of alienage.
Submitted February 10, 2009
Decided June 25, 2009
Opinion by Judge Ikuta
Devin J. Burstein, San Diego, CA
Aaron B. Clark, San Diego, CA