Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Rutti v. Lojack Corp., No. 07-56599

By FindLaw Staff on August 21, 2009 5:05 PM

In an action under the Fair Labor Standards Act seeking compensation for the time plaintiff spent commuting to worksites in defendant's vehicles, summary judgment for defendant is affirmed in part where use of an employer's vehicle for commuting is not compensable, but reversed in part where the transmissions plaintiff sent to defendant at the end of the working day may be compensable.

Read Rutti v. Lojack Corp., No. 07-56599

Appellate Information

Argued and Submitted February 4, 2009

Filed August 21, 2009

Judges

Opinion by Judge Callahan

Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge Hall

Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge Silverman

Counsel

For Appellants:

John Glugoski, Righetti Law Firm, San Francisco, CA

For Appellee:

Peter D. Holbrook, Los Angeles, CA

Dan Chammas, McDermott Will & Emery LLP, Los Angeles, CA

Copied to clipboard

Find a Lawyer

More Options