Block on Trump's Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
In an action by the EEOC claiming that defendant terminated an employee in retaliation for engaging in protected activity, judgment for plaintiff is affirmed where: 1) there was sufficient evidence for a reasonable jury to conclude that plaintiff complained of discrimination based on his religion; and 2) the jury could reasonably conclude that the employee had the option of returning to his original sales position at defendant company.
Opinion by Judge W. Fletcher
Dissent by Judge Noonan
James M. Tucker, EEOC, Washington, DC