Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Search for legal issues
For help near (city, ZIP code or county)
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location

US v. Montalvo, No. 07-16762

Article Placeholder Image
By FindLaw Staff on September 16, 2009 4:44 PM

In a drug prosecution, denial of defendant's motion to correct his sentence pursuant to a prior version of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 35(a) is affirmed where: 1) there is no material difference between the "discretionary" life term authorized by 21 U.S.C. section 848(a) and the "mandatory" life term authorized by section 848(b); 2) defendant could not challenge the process by which his sentence was imposed under Rule 35(a); and 3) Rule 35(a) did not permit defendant to raise the argument that the district court erred in finding facts relevant to the sentence without submitting those facts to the jury.

Read US v. Montalvo, No. 07-16762

Appellate Information

Argued and Submitted March 10, 2009

Filed September 16, 2009


Opinion by Judge Wallace


For Appellant:

Richard B. Mazer, Law Offices of Richard B. Mazer, San Francisco, CA

For Appellee:

Phillip A. Talbert, Assistant United States Attorney, Chief of Appeals, Sacramento, CA

Find a Lawyer

More Options