Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Irigoyen-Briones v. Holder, No. 07-71806

By FindLaw Staff on October 01, 2009 6:00 PM

In a petition for review of the BIA's denial of petitioner's motion to reconsider its rejection of petitioner's appeal as being untimely filed, the petition is denied where 8 C.F.R. section 1003.38(b) is ambiguous regarding the BIA's jurisdiction to consider late filings, and the BIA's interpretation barring petitioner's filing was not plainly erroneous or inconsistent with the language of the regulation.

Read Irigoyen-Briones v. Holder, No. 07-71806

Appellate Information

Argued and Submitted March 10, 2009

Filed September 29, 2009

Judges

Opinion by Judge Smith

Dissent by Judge Kleinfeld

Counsel

For Petitioner:

Charles E. Nichol, Law Offices of Charles E. Nichol, San Francisco, CA

For Respondent:

Charles Canter and Ronald E. LeFevre, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard

Find a Lawyer

More Options