Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Legal Aid Servs. of Or. v. Legal Servs. Corp., No. 08-35467

By FindLaw Staff on November 23, 2009 7:10 AM

In a First Amendment challenge to restrictions on lobbying, soliciting clients, participating in class actions, and seeking attorneys' fees imposed on legal aid organizations that received federal grants through the Legal Services Corporation, summary judgment for defendants is affirmed where: 1) the regulations did not discriminate against any particular viewpoint or motivating ideology; and 2) plaintiffs' professed fear that their federal funding might be terminated was not sufficient to support an as-applied challenge.

Read Legal Aid Servs. of Or. v. Legal Servs. Corp., No. 08-35467

Appellate Information

Argued and Submitted July 7, 2009

Filed November 23, 2009

Judges

Opinion by Judge Tashima

Dissent by Judge Pregerson

Counsel

For Appellants:

Stephen S. Walters, Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis, San Francisco, CA

Beverly C. Pearman, Stoel Rives LLP, Portland, OR

For Appellee:

William S. Freeman, Palo Alto, CA

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard

Find a Lawyer

More Options