Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Search for legal issues
For help near (city, ZIP code or county)
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location

US v. Hinkson, No. 05-30303

Article Placeholder Image
By FindLaw Staff on November 05, 2009 3:58 PM

The Ninth Circuit re-states its "abuse of discretion" standard of review, which now requires it to: 1) consider whether the district court identified the correct legal standard for decision of the issue before it; and 2) determine whether the district court's findings of fact, and its application of those findings of fact to the correct legal standard, were illogical, implausible, or without support in inferences that could be drawn from facts in the record.  Defendant's murder for hire conviction is affirmed where, applying the re-stated standard, the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant's motion for a new trial.

Read US v. Hinkson, No. 05-30303

Appellate Information

Argued and Submitted December 16, 2008\

Filed November 5, 2009


Opinion by Judge Bea

Dissent by Judge B. Fletcher


For Appellant:

Dennis P. Riordan and Donald M. Horgan, San Francisco, CA

For Appellee:

John F. De Pue and Michael D. Taxay, Department of Justice, Washington, DC

Find a Lawyer

More Options