Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Search for legal issues
For help near (city, ZIP code or county)
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location

Ashland Sch. Dist. v. Parents of E.H., No. 08-35926

Article Placeholder Image
By FindLaw Staff on December 07, 2009 3:57 PM

In an Individuals with Disabilities Education Act action, the district court's order denying reimbursement to plaintiff-parents for their child's residential treatment is affirmed where: 1) the district court adequately responded to the hearing officer's conclusions before reaching a contrary result; 2) parents' failure to give notice was a relevant consideration when determining whether to deny reimbursement; and 3) the record contained ample evidence supporting the district court's conclusion that the parents placed the child in residential care to treat medical, not educational, problems.

Read Ashland Sch. Dist. v. Parents of E.H., No. 08-35926

Appellate Information

Argued and Submitted October 8, 2009

Filed December 7, 2009

Judges

Opinion by Judge O'Scannlain

Counsel

For Appellant:

Mary E. Broadhurst, Eugene, OR

For Appellee:

Andrea L. Hungerford and Nancy J. Hungerford, Hungerford Law Firm, LLP, Oregon City, OR

Find a Lawyer

More Options