Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Search for legal issues
For help near (city, ZIP code or county)
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location

Birdsong v. Apple, Inc., No. 08-16641

Article Placeholder Image
By FindLaw Staff on December 31, 2009 11:53 AM

In an action claiming that Apple's iPod was defective because it posed an unreasonable risk of noise-induced hearing loss to its users, dismissal of the action is affirmed where: 1) the plaintiffs admitted that the iPod had an ordinary purpose of listening to music, and nothing they alleged suggested iPods were unsafe for that use or defective; 2) the plaintiffs failed to allege how the absence of their suggested changes to the iPod caused any user an injury; and 3) plaintiffs did not allege the requisite injury in fact to have standing under California's Unfair Competition Law.

Read Birdsong v. Apple, Inc., No. 08-16641

Appellate Information

Argued and Submitted October 8, 2009

Filed December 30, 2009


Opinion by Judge Thompson


For Appellants:

Jeff D. Friedman, Berkeley, CA

For Appellee:

David Bernick, New York, NY

Find a Lawyer

More Options