Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Search for legal issues
For help near (city, ZIP code or county)
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location

Richardson v. Runnels, No. 07-16736

Article Placeholder Image
By FindLaw Staff on January 13, 2010 5:19 PM

In a 42 U.S.C. section 1983 action by a prisoner alleging that he was placed in racially discriminatory lockdowns, summary judgment for defendants is affirmed in part where the lockdown did not violate due process because it did not impose extraordinary hardship on plaintiff. However, the order is reversed in part where defendants offered no evidence to disprove plaintiff's claim of racial discrimination.

Read Richardson v. Runnels, No. 07-16736

Appellate Information

Argued and Submitted February 13, 2009

Filed January 12, 2010

Judges

Opinion by Judge Noonan

Counsel

For Appellant:

Cynthia J. Larsen, Sacramento, CA

For Appellees:

John W. Riches, II, Sacramento, CA

Find a Lawyer

More Options