Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Search for legal issues
For help near (city, ZIP code or county)
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location

Schultz v. US, No. 08-17304

Article Placeholder Image
By FindLaw Staff on February 09, 2010 3:56 PM

In an appeal from the district court's denial of appellant's motion to intervene as of right in a securities fraud action, the order is affirmed where appellant was improperly attempting to enforce a restitution order in a parallel criminal action in a manner outside the scope of 18 U.S.C. section 3664(m)(1)(B).

Read Schultz v. US, No. 08-17304

Appellate Information

Argued and Submitted December 11, 2009

Filed February 9, 2010

Judges

Opinion by Judge Lynn

Counsel

For Appellant:

Richard M. Goldstein, Goldstein, Tanen & Trench, P.A., Miami, FL

For Appellee:

Evan Jason Smith, Esquire, Brodsky & smith, LLC, Beverly Hills, CA

Find a Lawyer

More Options