Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Laforest v. Honeywell Int'l., Inc., No. 06-5712-cv

By FindLaw Staff on June 18, 2009 2:05 PM

In an ERISA action to enforce a pension guaranty agreement, the District Court's award of attorney's fees to Plaintiffs based on the summary judgment they obtained on their ERISA claims is vacated where the District Court erred by taking into account factors relating to non-ERISA claims in the lawsuit in determining the fee award.

Read the full decision in Laforest v. Honeywell Int'l., Inc., No. 06-5712-cv.

Appellate Information:

Argued on May 29, 2008
Decided on June 18, 2009

Judges:

Before JACOBS, Chief Judge, CALABRESI and SACK, Circuit Judges. Chief Judge Jacobs concurs in part and dissents in part in a seperate opinion

Opinion by SACK, Circuit Judge.

Counsel:

WILLIAM A. WERTHEIMER, JR., Bingham Farms, Michigan, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

JOSEPH J. COSTELLO (Tasmin J. Newman of counsel), Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania for Defendant-Third- Party-Plaintiff-Appellant. 

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard

Find a Lawyer

More Options