Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Rotimi v. Holder, No. 06-0202

By FindLaw Staff on August 14, 2009 3:46 PM

Petition for review of an order holding plaintiff statutorily ineligible for a waiver of inadmissibility and dismissing plaintiff's appeal is denied where the Board of Immigration Appeals' interpretation of "lawfully resided continuously" as used in Immigration and Nationality Act sec. 212(h) and applied to plaintiff is reasonable, and thus plaintiff is ineligible for a INA sec. 212(h) waiver because he did not lawfully reside continuously in the United States for the disputed period of time. 

Read Rotimi v. Holder, No. 06-0202

Appellate Information
Petition for review of a decision and order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.
Argued March 23, 2009
Decided August 14, 2009

Judges
Before FEINBERG, NEWMAN, and KATZMANN, Circuit Judges.
Per Curium Opinion.
NEWMAN, Circuit Judge, concurring.
KATZMANN, Circuit Judge, with whom FEINBERG, Circuit Judge, joins, concurring.

Counsel
For Petitioner: DANIEL SHABASSON, Pollack, Pollack, Isaac & DeCicco, New York, N.Y.

For Respondent: DIONE M. ENEA, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y.

Copied to clipboard

Find a Lawyer

More Options