Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Puglisi v. US, No. 04-4834

Article Placeholder Image
By FindLaw Staff on November 17, 2009 1:04 PM

In an appeal from the district court's denial of defendant's 28 U.S.C. section 2255 motion to vacate his conviction and sentence due to ineffective assistance of counsel, the order is affirmed where defendant failed to produce or identify evidence of actual prejudice.

Read Puglisi v. US, No. 04-4834

Appellate Information

Argued: January 29, 2008

Decided: November 17, 2009

Judges

Opinion by Judge Winter

Counsel

For Appellant:

Cheryl J. Sturm, Chadds Ford, PA

For Appellee:

Jo Ann M. Navickas, Peter A. Norling, Assistant United States Attorneys, Brooklyn, NY

Copied to clipboard

Find a Lawyer

More Options