Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Search for legal issues
For help near (city, ZIP code or county)
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location

Turkmen v. Ashcroft, No. 06-3745

Article Placeholder Image
By FindLaw Staff on December 21, 2009 3:59 PM

In an action claiming abuse, mistreatment, and detention of Arab and Muslim aliens who were held on immigration violations in the wake of the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, an order partially dismissing the complaint is affirmed in part where there was no clearly established equal protection right to be free of selective enforcement of immigration laws based on national origin, race, or religion at the time of plaintiffs' detentions.  However, the order is vacated in part where defendant-officials were entitled to qualified immunity because a law enforcement official's actual motivation for the Fourth Amendment seizure of a person was constitutionally irrelevant if the seizure was supported by probable cause.

Read Turkmen v. Ashcroft, No. 06-3745

Appellate Information

Argued: February 14, 2008

Decided: December 18, 2009

Judges

Per Curiam

Counsel

For Appellants:

Robert M. Loeb, Peter D. Keisler, Gregory G. Garre, Jonathan F. Cohn and R. Craig Lawrence, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC

For Appellees:

Michael Winger, C. William Phillips, Kate Greenwood, Amanda J. Gourdine, and Kimberly Zelnick, Covington & Burling LLP, New York, NY

Claudia SlovinskyLaw Offices of Claudia Slovinsky, New York, NY

Find a Lawyer

More Options