Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Kiobel v. Millson, No. 07-3903

By FindLaw Staff on January 08, 2010 4:20 PM

In an appeal from an order pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 11 sanctioning defense counsel for making factual representations that lacked evidentiary support, the order is reversed where, in light of the record evidence: 1) it was legally erroneous for the magistrate judge to conclude that the statement "there can be no doubt that the witnesses are giving testimony that counsel knows to be false" was utterly lacking in support and therefore sanctionable; and 2) counsel's possible overstatement of the money allegedly sent by plaintiffs' counsel to certain witnesses did not violate Rule 11.

Read Kiobel v. Millson, No. 07-3903

Appellate Information

Argued: January 12, 2009

Decided: January 8, 2010

Judges

Opinion by Judge Cabranes

Counsel

For Appellants:

Rowan D. Wilson, Douglas J. Dixon and Noah J. Phillips, Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP, New York, NY

For Appellees:

Peter Nordberg, Stephen A. Whinston, Carey R. D'Avino, Berger & Montague, P.C., Philadelphia, PA

Copied to clipboard

Find a Lawyer

More Options