Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Search for legal issues
For help near (city, ZIP code or county)
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location

US v. Rossi, No. 08-6108

Article Placeholder Image
By FindLaw Staff on January 28, 2010 5:29 PM

In an insurance fraud prosecution, the district court's amended restitution order is affirmed where the provisions of the governing statute in this case, the Victim and Witness Protection Act of 1982, were complied with because, inter alia, the restitution order was imposed at the time that defendant was resentenced following the court of appeals' remand, and defendant did not show that she was prejudiced by the lapse of time preceding resentencing.

Read US v. Rossi, No. 08-6108

Appellate Information

Argued: November 18, 2009

Decided: January 28, 2010

Judges

Per Curiam

Counsel

For Appellant:

Richard Ware Levitt, Levitt & Kaizer, New York, NY

For Appellee:

Jesse M. Furman and Rebecca A. Rohr, Assistant United States Attorneys, New York, NY

Find a Lawyer

More Options