Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Search for legal issues
For help near (city, ZIP code or county)
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location

In re: Zyprexa Prods. Liab. Litig., No. 07-3815

Article Placeholder Image
By FindLaw Staff on February 04, 2010 1:38 PM

In a drug defect product liability litigation, appellant-law firm's interlocutory appeal from the district court's order finding that all of appellant-law firm's cases that were pending in the district court were subject to certain attorney compensation strictures and that appellant was prohibited from making any disbursements from a fund that it maintained until a fund administrator had certified that the protocols had been adhered to, is dismissed where the injunction did not give or aid in giving substantive relief sought in the lawsuit, and thus there was no jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. section 1292(a).

Read In re: Zyprexa Prods. Liab. Litig., No. 07-3815

Appellate Information

Argued: March 12, 2009

Final Submission: June 17, 2009

Judges

Per Curiam

Counsel

For Appellant:

Robert J. Lack, Friedman Kaplan Seiler & Adelman LLP, New York, NY

Eric Roberson, The Mulligan Law Firm, Dallas, TX

For Appellee:

William M. Audet, Audet & Partners, LLP, San Francisco, CA

James M. Shaughnessy, Milberg LLP, New York, NY

Find a Lawyer

More Options