Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Search for legal issues
For help near (city, ZIP code or county)
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location

Fry v. Exelon Corp. Cash Balance Pension Plan, No. 08-1135

Article Placeholder Image
By FindLaw Staff on July 02, 2009 2:25 PM

In a dispute involving pension benefits, district court judgment is affirmed where under ERISA an age is the normal retirement age because the pension plan's text makes it so, and thus the statutory language allows employers to vary by contract aspects of pension plans and specify a normal retirement age that may differ from typical retirement patterns. 

Read Fry v. Exelon Corp. Cash Balance Pension Plan, No. 08-1135

Appellate Information
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division.
Argued: April 3, 2009
Decided: July 2, 2009

Judges
Before EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge, and EVANS and SYKES, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge.

Find a Lawyer

More Options