Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Search for legal issues
For help near (city, ZIP code or county)
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location

US v. Anderson, No. 08-2925

Article Placeholder Image
By FindLaw Staff on September 04, 2009 3:52 PM

District court's sentence and conviction of defendant for multiple crimes related to a fraudulent telemarketing scheme is affirmed where:  1) the evidence presented at trial was sufficient to support the jury's verdict that defendant acted with knowledge of a telemarketing company's fraudulent activity and with the specific intent to defraud telemarketing company's victims; 2) district court did not clearly err in applying the manager-or-supervisor enhancement as supported by evidence of defendant's involvement and control over the scheme; and 3) defendant failed to overcome the presumption that his below-guidelines sentence is reasonable.       

Read US v. Anderson, No. 08-2925

Appellate Information

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois

Argued May 5, 2009
Decided September 3, 2009

Judges

Before Ripple and Sykes, Circuit Judges, and Lawrence, District Judge. 

Find a Lawyer

More Options