Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

US v. Winbush, No. 08-1602

By FindLaw Staff on September 01, 2009 5:12 PM

District court's sentence and conviction of defendant on five drug-related crimes is affirmed where: 1) district court did not err by denying defendant's motion to retain a fingerprint expert as not only was defendant's motion untimely, but also unnecessary for his defense; 2) district court properly admitted agent's testimony regarding attributes of drug trafficking as the testimony was general in nature and not prejudicial; and 3) court did not commit clear error in calculating defendant's base offense and criminal history levels.     

Read US v. Winbush, No. 08-1602

Appellate Information

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana, Hammond Division.
Argued April 14, 2009
Decided September, 2009

Judges

Before Kanne, Rovner, and Wood, Circuit Judges 
Opinion by Kanne, Circuit Judge.

Copied to clipboard

Find a Lawyer

More Options