Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Search for legal issues
For help near (city, ZIP code or county)
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location

US v. Young, No. 08-2357

Article Placeholder Image
By FindLaw Staff on December 23, 2009 3:01 PM

In the prosecution of an employee at a day spa where sexual massages were provided to spa customers, imposition of the minimum term of imprisonment called for by the Sentencing Guidelines on defendant convicted of conspiring to use the facilities of interstate commerce to facilitate prostitution is affirmed as the district court properly determined defendant's offense level and she has not shown which of the Guidelines factors, if any, was sufficiently meritorious to require explicit discussion by the court or to rebut the presumption of reasonableness attached to the within-Guidelines sentence imposed.     

Read US v. Young, No. 08-2357

Appellate Information

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana, Hammond Division

Decided December 23, 2009

Judges

Before:  Rovner, Manion, and Tinder, Circuit Judges

Opinion by Rovner,  Circuit Judge

Find a Lawyer

More Options