Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Search for legal issues
For help near (city, ZIP code or county)
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location

US v. Lane, No. 09-1057

Article Placeholder Image
By FindLaw Staff on January 12, 2010 3:51 PM

Conviction of defendant for conspiracy to distribute crack cocaine and related crimes is affirmed where: 1) district court did not commit plain error in admitting officer testimony regarding firsthand knowledge; 2) there was more than enough evidence for the jury to find defendant guilty of possession with intent to distribute; 3) it was improper for a witness to mention defendant's criminal history, but the district judge exercised proper discretion in not sua sponte declaring a mistrial; and 4) defendant's argument that the district court miscalculated the applicable drug weight and subsequent guidelines offense level is irrelevant as the district court did not use the guidelines to arrive at the sentence but relied on credible testimony and government evidence.  

Read US v. Lane, No. 09-1057

Appellate Information

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of Illinois

Decided January 12, 2010

Judges

Before:  Evan and Sykes, Circuit Judges, and Der-Yeghuayan, District Judge

Opinion by Circuit Judge Evans

Find a Lawyer

More Options