Block on Trump's Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Conviction of defendant for dealing crack cocaine is affirmed where: 1) the district court did not commit error in allowing a forensic chemist's testimony at defendant's trial; and 2) the court did not abuse its discretion in admitting evidence of drugs without witness testimony as to how the drugs were handled during testing.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin
Decided January 12, 2010
Opinion by Van Bokkelen, District Judge