Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Search for legal issues
For help near (city, ZIP code or county)
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location

Gant v. US, 10-1574

Article Placeholder Image
By FindLaw Staff on December 10, 2010 2:26 PM

Challenges to rensentencing following conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm

Gant v. US, 10-1574, concerned a challenge to the district court's denial of defendant's request for habeas relief challenging the resentencing following a conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm.


In affirming, the court held that, because defendant has failed to meet his burden to show that he requested his appellate counsel to file an appeal, this ineffective assistance of counsel claim lacks merit.  Aslo, defendant's claim that his appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to investigate and challenge his armed career criminal (ACC) classification is without merit.  Lastly, the court rejected defendant's claim that the district court erred when it classified him as an ACC as he did not bring this claim on appeal and has not established cause and prejudice.

Related Link:

Find a Lawyer

More Options