Action challenging property assessments
Heyde v. Pittenger, 09-1388, concerned a plaintiff's suit against members of a county Board of Review (BOR) and town's assessors, claiming that by setting his property's assessment at levels grossly disproportionate to its fair market value, the BOR and the assessors deprived him of his equal protection rights, and retaliated against him for previously exercising his right to challenge assessments.
Heyde v. Pittenger, 09-1388, concerned a plaintiff's suit against members of a county Board of Review (BOR) and town's assessors, claiming that by setting his property's assessment at levels grossly disproportionate to its fair market value, the BOR and the assessors deprived him of his equal protection rights, and retaliated against him for previously exercising his right to challenge assessments.
In affirming the judgment of the district court, the court held that,
because the BOR members are quasi-judicial in nature, they are entitled
to absolute immunity. The court also held that under McNary and
precedent, the district judge properly dismissed without prejudice
plaintiff's claims against the assessors citing principles of comity.
Related Link:
Related Link:
- Read the Seventh Circuit's Full Decision in Heyde v. Pittenger, 09-1388
