Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

US v. Johnson, No. 08-3925

By FindLaw Staff on June 30, 2009 1:08 PM

Defendants' drug possession sentences are affirmed where neither Defendant was eligible for a reduced sentence under 18 U.S.C. section 3582(c)(2), because their sentences were based solely on powder cocaine, meaning that Amendment 706 to the Guidelines would not have the effect of lowering their sentences.

Read US v. Johnson, No. 08-3925

Appellate Information

Submitted: June 18, 2009

Decided and Filed: June 30, 2009

Judges

Opinion by Judge Moore

Counsel

For Appellant:

Andy P. Hart, Office of the Federal Public Defender, Toledo, OH

For Appellee:

Blas E. Serrano, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Cleveland, OH

Copied to clipboard

Find a Lawyer

More Options