Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Search for legal issues
For help near (city, ZIP code or county)
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location

Borger v. CSX Trans., Inc., No. 08-3685

Article Placeholder Image
By FindLaw Staff on July 08, 2009 12:32 PM

In an action by rail workers alleging injuries from exposure to hydrochloric acid fumes, summary judgment for Defendant is affirmed where Defendant rail carrier's failure to perform a ten-point inspection under 49 C.F.R. section 173.31 did not violate that regulation because it did not apply to rail carriers such as Defendant.

Read Borger v. CSX Trans., Inc., No. 08-3685

Appellate Information

Argued: May 1, 2009

Decided and Filed: July 8, 2009

Judges

Opinion by Judge Martin

Counsel

For Appellants:

Martin J. Holmes, Jr., Shindler, Neff, Holmes, Schlageter & Mohler, Toledo, OH

For Appellee:

Dan Himmelfarb, Mayer Brown LLP, Washington, DC

Find a Lawyer

More Options