Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Search for legal issues
For help near (city, ZIP code or county)
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location

US v. Bogart, No. 07-3779

Article Placeholder Image
By FindLaw Staff on August 14, 2009 4:36 PM

Defendant's wire fraud sentence is affirmed, where: 1) the District Court's failure to comply with 18 U.S.C. section 3664(d)(5) did not deprive it of jurisdiction to enter its restitution order; and 2) a District Court may rely on a defendant's education and future earning potential in setting a restitution payment schedule.

Read US v. Bogart, No. 07-3779

Appellate Information

Argued: June 18, 2009

Decided and Filed: August 14, 2009

Judges

Opinion by Judge Clay

Counsel

For Appellant:

Frederick D. Benton, Jr., Law Office, Columbus, OH

For Appellee:

Brenda S. Shoemaker, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbus, OH

Find a Lawyer

More Options